
Title: Life After Cars: Freeing Ourselves from the Tyranny of the Automobile
Author: Sarah Goodyear, Doug Gordon and Aaron Naparstek
Completed: Feb 2026 (Full list of books)
Overview: For years, I’ve listened to their podcast and really enjoyed the content. Much of it I agree with, but even when I don’t, it helps me refine my ideas about why I feel cars destroy communities. This book clearly lays out the explanation for the many ways in which cars harm people, cities, the environment, and even drivers. This book should be read by everyone who likes living in vibrant places but feels like it could be better. If you want to vacation in places with fewer cars (Paris, Amsterdam, Disney) but think home could NEVER be like that, you should read this book.
Highlights:
- Automobiles have produced far more collective damage to the world, in terms of death, illness, and environmental destruction, than nearly any other invention in human history.
- In 1969, 42 percent of American children walked or biked to school. In 2017, that number was 11 percent.
- In the first panel of Action Comics number 12, published in May 1939, mild-mannered reporter Clark Kent is outside the offices of the Daily Star, a precursor to the more famous Daily Planet. A small crowd has gathered, and when Kent asks someone what has happened, he is shocked to learn that a friend of his has been hit and killed by a reckless driver. Enraged, Kent calls the city’s mayor and asks why Metropolis has “one of the worst traffic situations in the country.” The mayor’s response will likely be familiar to anyone who has tried to get an elected official to take traffic violence seriously. “It’s really too bad,” the mayor says. “But—what can anyone do about it?” Kent vows to do something about it himself.
- What is most shocking is that the biggest threat to the citizens of Metropolis in 1939 was not a monster or alien invader nor even Superman’s famous archenemy Lex Luthor, who wouldn’t appear in print until a year later. It was the car.
- At least twenty-five more people would be killed in auto-related fatalities in the United States through the end of 1899, a high number given that only around 2,500 motor vehicles were produced in the country that year.
- an editorial cartoonist for The St. Louis Star depicted a man kneeling before an automobile, the car’s headlights appearing like eyes and its grille illustrated to look like a gaping maw. The man, wearing a jacket labeled “reckless and vicious drivers,” offers a plate of children’s bodies as a ritual sacrifice to what is labeled as the “Modern Moloch.”
- A pedestrian struck by a driver at sixteen miles per hour has only a 10 percent chance of being severely injured or killed, while a pedestrian struck at thirty-one miles per hour has a 50 percent chance. That jumps to a 75 percent chance of severe injury or death at thirty-nine miles per hour, and a 90 percent chance at forty-six miles per hour. Which means that being hit by a driver just doing the legal speed limit on most roads in the US equals almost certain death. And the increasing mass of modern vehicles means the equation is only getting less favorable for people outside the car.
- Even the famous expression “America’s love affair with cars” was a car industry creation, not some folksy saying that arose spontaneously. Peter Norton discovered that the phrase appeared in a 1957 Chevrolet ad before being popularized in a television special that aired on October 21, 1961, on NBC. Called Merrily We Roll Along and starring comedian Groucho Marx, the special was sponsored by DuPont, which at the time owned a 23 percent stake in General Motors. In the special, Groucho says that “our love affair with the automobile” started long ago, and that “it was a real love affair, one that changed our whole way of life.”
- According to some residents, the bike lanes were unnecessary, because so few cyclists used them. Other residents insisted the lanes were dangerous because there were so many cyclists using them.
- According to a study conducted by researchers at the University of South Florida, cyclists are just about as law-abiding as drivers. The researchers recruited one hundred bike riders from the Tampa region and equipped their bicycles with sensors, cameras, and GPS trackers. After recording the cyclists’ movements for two thousand hours and analyzing the data, the study found that the cyclists obeyed traffic laws 88 percent of the time, while similar observations of drivers showed that they obeyed the law 85 percent of the time.
- After surveying nearly eighteen thousand people in seventy-three countries, they found that 100 percent of respondents admitted to breaking the law while driving, walking, or cycling. Where things differed was in the reasons various road users gave for flouting the rules. Drivers and pedestrians said they typically broke laws to save time. Cyclists, however, said they typically broke laws to stay safe, doing things like riding on the sidewalk to avoid mixing it up on a dangerous road with cars and trucks. Cyclists also said they broke laws to save energy—rolling through a stop sign, for instance, to avoid having to start pedaling again from a dead standstill. The researchers said that while such behavior was technically illegal, “most bicyclists can generally be described as rational individuals trying to function safely and efficiently given the context and norms of where they live and the transportation system put in front of them.”
- When Sean Kenney, an artist, moved from the US to Amsterdam with his wife and two children in 2020, he was aware of this history. The ease of getting around by foot and by bike was part of the appeal. What he was not prepared for was the culture shock that came with moving from a place where kids are uniquely at risk of being harmed by cars to a place that had spent decades making its streets safe for even the youngest pedestrians and cyclists. After signing a lease on an apartment, Sean received what, to him, seemed like a strange apology from his new landlord. The landlord handed over a few sets of keys: one for Sean, one for his wife, and one for their nine-year-old daughter. The landlord motioned to Sean’s six-year-old son and said, “I’m sorry that I only have three sets of keys for the four of you, but you can get another made at the shop around the corner.” Sean looked at his young son and then at the landlord. “A key for the six-year-old?” he asked incredulously. She gave him a quizzical stare, as if the two of them were speaking totally different languages.
- It took years of methodical inquiry along with the occasional epiphany, but finally the researchers isolated a chemical compound that they believed was to blame for killing half of the coho salmon that try to make it to spawning grounds each year. It comes from the tires of our cars.
- In Traffication, Paul Donald writes extensively about the way noise affects a wide range of animals: “When exposed to prolonged traffic noise, zebra finches become less good at finding food, roosting bats become more susceptible to disease, great tits suffer severe sleep disruption and frogs become unable to produce antimicrobial proteins to fight infection,” he writes. “Mice develop problems with motor coordination and their brains shrink.” Donald cites research showing that prolonged exposure to the stress hormone cortisol, which is released when animals are exposed to even low levels of traffic noise, is shortening the lives of at least some species by breaking down the telomeres on their chromosomes: “Birds raised in the presence of traffic noise are prematurely aged, and their future lifespans already curtailed, before they have even left the nest.”
- In 2022, 46,027 people died in vehicle crashes in the US—and 9,188 of those were pedestrians, a worrying development that researchers believe may be due to the ballooning size of American cars and SUVs, as well as the proliferation of screens and other distractions.
- in 1965, the same year that Nader published his book, The New York Times reported that physicians were picketing the New York Auto Show demanding a reduction in tailpipe emissions, among other measures to protect human health from the scourge of the automobile.
- It’s worth noting, too, that eliminating tailpipes altogether, as electric cars do, doesn’t get rid of pollution that harms human health, because electric cars don’t eliminate the spread of microplastics and other toxic chemicals. Scientists in California looking at plastic particles in ocean water believe that tire dust and fragments probably are the largest source of this pollution. Particles from brake wear contribute to high levels of magnetite in the environment that have been linked to the development of Alzheimer’s disease, one of the leading causes of death among older people globally.
- giving people transit as an option can substantively improve their health. Japanese researchers took the opportunity to look at the data from a natural experiment that occurred when planners added a transit station to a line that passed through a rural area. Annual health care costs for people in the area affected by the change went down by more than US$600 per year in just four years. “This study’s results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that increased access to transit may increase physical activity among transit users and may lead to decreased healthcare expenditures,” the researchers wrote.
- This at a time when Americans were being told that urban decline was an inevitable scourge that could be solved only by “slum clearance” to replace dwellings and business districts, often belonging to Black and brown people, and that “crime” was driving people away from urban life. (Appleyard and his team found that in fact more people cited concerns about traffic degrading their neighborhoods than about crime.)
- Using data from Germany, where more than 50 percent of trips are taken by car, they concluded that “cycling rather than driving was positively associated with orientation towards the common good in all models…. These findings are significant for policy and planning because the benefits of cycling over driving are more profound and sustainable than previously thought.” In other words, cyclists make better neighbors. Why, then, do we make it so hard to choose biking and walking?
- Stanford Open Policing Project showed that Black drivers were 20 percent more likely than white ones to be stopped, and that after a traffic stop, they were 1.5 to 2 times more likely to undergo a search for contraband and weapons—even though “[B]lack and Hispanic drivers were searched on the basis of less evidence than white drivers.” This is why we, and many other advocates, call for automated camera enforcement of moving violations like speed limits and red-light running (as well as passive controls on reckless driving, such as speed governors). Cameras don’t discriminate. Too often, cops do.
- According to a police report, the young driver in this case “failed to control speed as he accelerated to intentionally blow black diesel smoke in the path of several bicyclists.” He hit six of them, leaving their bodies and bikes strewn across the roadway. All six miraculously survived, although several sustained life-altering injuries. The local district attorney closed the case without charging the kid, who graduated from high school a couple of years after the crash. Funny, who faces consequences and who doesn’t.
- “I think there’s this real fear to give up that mobility access and to talk about life without driving,” said Anna Zivarts, an organizer and videographer who wrote a book called When Driving Is Not an Option: Steering Away from Car Dependency
- After a century of building more and more spots in the hopes of finding a place to put our cars wherever we stop driving them, we are left with anywhere from a billion to two billion parking spaces in the United States. No one is really sure how many; at the same time, everyone also seems to be sure that there could never be enough. Because while we’ve been striping all those parking spaces, we have also been building up an enormous sense of entitlement among drivers, who expect to be able to bring their vehicles up to the front door of whatever their destination might be.
- a nine-mile (fourteen-kilometer) section of one of the most important highways in the United States was completely shut down. (Had 2,500 gallons of fuel spilled in the ocean, it would have been seen as an environmental disaster, but 2,500 gallons of fuel spilling in a major American city, lighting on fire, and choking the air with poisonous smoke was seen primarily as a major headache for drivers.)
- Pandemic-era outdoor dining programs saved jobs, provided a COVID-weary populace with an opportunity to forget their worries at least for a moment, and had the knock-on effect of creating an entirely new constituency for better and higher uses of public space. Almost overnight, the people who supported rethinking how cities and towns manage parking weren’t just fanatical anti-car advocates or Brooklyn-based podcast hosts. They were conservative mayors applying their market-oriented philosophy to help the local economy. They were small business owners of all political stripes, many of whom would have previously scoffed at losing so much as a single parking space in front of or behind their establishments. Perhaps best of all, they were the countless restaurant patrons in cities and suburbs alike who suddenly understood that in the space it takes to store one or two cars, a dozen or more people can enjoy a meal.















